Conflicts Of Interests

Posted in Markets Compliance on January 19, 2024
Conflicts Of Interests

Conflicts of interests. The identification and management of prevalence of the insider trading in the corporate debt market, and the related conflicts of interest within financial intermediaries are crucial for Markets Compliance. 

Conflicts Of Interests

Conflicts Of Interests

Conflicts of interest are relatively pervasive, and inherent. The structure of conflicts in the market equilibrium may be important and dealing with an individual conflict in isolation may not be best. The structure of a company may evolve in response to managing the conflict efficiently, and the structure of regulation. The agent (adviser) often works for multiple principals (accounts).

The agent’s payoff can have different sensitivities to its principals (accounts) due to such factors as incentive compensation, different management fee rates, the effect of past performance, and the shape of the flow for spillovers from “Star” funds.  Favor one client over another and allocating profitable trades to the favored client leads to a conflict of interest. 

Gain access to expert-developed courses and industry insights that will enhance your knowledge in anti-financial crime, compliance, and risk management and accelerate your career.

Rated 4.8 EXCELLENT on Trustpilot

  • 100+ courses and webinars
  • 3 certification programs
  • 100+ downloadable templates

Target Bonds

Target bonds rated higher than the acquirer’s stand to lose whereas those rated lower stand to gain. Since selling (buying) target bonds that stand to lose (gain) before the public announcement requires information about acquirer characteristics, the evidence is less likely to be due to market anticipation and is consistent with insider trading.

There is some evidence that bond dealers affiliated with some advisors sell in anticipation of negative news on bonds, pointing to a possible channel of information leakage. Such negative news seems to be incorporated into bond prices no slower than into the target stocks. Finally, recent improvements in bond market transparency appear to deter insider trading in bonds.

Although there is an unresolved debate amongst economists and jurists weighing the social costs, and benefits of insider trading, corporations have an interest in restricting information-based insider trading for several reasons. First, the information associated with insider transactions imposes a direct adverse-selection cost on outside investors, and thereby decreases liquidity.

Second, such insider trading decreases confidence in the capital markets among investors who hold the fundamental view that insider trading is inconsistent with principles of fairness or that inside information is the sole property of the corporation.

Simple Principal-Agent Conflicts 

Executives setting their salary and benefits, unauthorized perks/ shirking, Insider Trading, broker churning to generate commission, broker recommending high-commission funds, broker front-running customer orders are conflicts of interests. Trading managed assets to benefit own position or the fund adviser growing assets beyond optimal size are also a conflict of interests.

Conflicts Across Multiple Principals 

The allocation of IPOs to favored clients, cross-client trading, allowing one client to front-run another, or allowing one client to arbitrage against another are also conflicts.

Conflicts Across Product Lines 

When the same firm is involved with multiple lines of businesses, they have different categories of clients. Some business lines may be more profitable than others. Some customers may be more sophisticated than others. The temptation to transfer the wealth toward more profitable lines, at the expense of less profitable lines, using market instruments and insider information, creates conflicts of interest.

Final Thoughts

A conflict of interest occurs when a person or entity becomes untrustworthy due to a clash between personal (or self-serving) interests and professional duties or responsibilities. When a company or individual has a vested interest, such as money, status, knowledge, relationships, or reputation, it calls into question whether their actions, judgment, and/or decision-making can be objective. When such a situation arises, the party is usually asked to leave, and it is frequently legally required.